GirlChat #726260

Start A New Topic!  Date Index  Thread Index

Reality, logic and language

Posted by manbot on 2018-August-18 13:13:59 EDT, Saturday
In reply to just alleged posted by EthanEdwards on 2018-August-18 08:46:39 EDT, Saturday
  Views: 0    Likes: 0     
Especially on the poor muzzled girls who dare not speak.

Because we all know 10-year-olds can speak openly about their sexual desire and love for much older guys. They have not been indoctrinated in anti-pedopilia since before they even knew what a clitoris was for.

If you insist girls face no negative consequences of any kind for speaking out for love and against anti-pedohpilia, do you also hold that pedophiles face no negative consequences from living openly as pro-contact pedophiles?


I'm also very confused as to why you insist on bringing up math, when you obviously reject mathmatical logic and proofs.

As for your special case, you can't even show an equivalence between girls and women. This follows necessarily from your special treatment of some women (alleged victims) and oppression of all girls (in particular girls loving pedophiles).

Does supporting anti-pedophilia, including genocide, necessarily show compassion and sympathy towards exclusive pedophiles?
Would supporting mild sodomy laws, as found in the US in 19th century, analogously show compassion and sympathy towards homosexual anti-pedophiles? Are you necessarily as indiffrent to the suffering of one group as you are to the other?

If, by looking very hard, we have not uncovered evidence for the Loch Ness monster, should our 100% faith in its existence be unchanged? Is the existence of said monster falsifiable?

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses