GirlChat #354669
Re: Now here's an interesting topic..
Posted by ILGO on 2006-May-24 12:29:12 EDT, Wednesday
In reply to Re: Now here's an interesting topic.. posted by Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 00:30:21 EDT, Wednesday
While I do tend to agree with your sentiments, as expressed above, I feel the need to ask the question: Why?
The treatment is believed to prolong human life.
Parents have done far far worse with less results than this for just that reason.
We don't allow children to refuse vaccinations; why would we allow them to refuse this treatment?
Just curious...
--I*Love*Green*Olives
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: Now here's an interesting topic.. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 02:36:24 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 14)
- Previous post in this thread should have been... - ILGO on 2006-May-24 05:24:50 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 13)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 07:24:29 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 06:16:17 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 11)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 07:30:41 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 8)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 09:18:04 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 7)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 19:06:18 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 4)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 19:47:25 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 20:11:03 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 22:05:47 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 23:21:16 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 22:05:47 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 20:11:03 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 19:47:25 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- It is outrageous that... - Magneto on 2006-May-24 13:31:16 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: It is outrageous that... - ILGO on 2006-May-24 20:18:09 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 19:06:18 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 4)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 09:18:04 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 7)
- It is! It is!! - jd420 on 2006-May-24 07:08:55 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: It is! It is!! - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 08:59:39 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 07:30:41 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 8)
- Previous post in this thread should have been... - ILGO on 2006-May-24 05:24:50 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 13)