GirlChat #560568
Potentially speaking
Posted by Gimwinkle on 2012-August-02 18:16:14 EDT, ThursdayNot totally off topic but...
Is it illegal to be a potential criminal?
Maybe this guy didn't know where he was???
Or, maybe he did.
The scary part is the use of "potential" in crucifying this guy in the media.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- What about kinetic sex offenders? - qtns2di4 on 2012-August-03 19:43:38 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Re: What about kinetic sex offenders? - Gimwinkle on 2012-August-04 07:04:54 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: What about kinetic sex offenders? - qtns2di4 on 2012-August-04 07:06:51 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Only... - Gimwinkle on 2012-August-04 20:49:34 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: What about kinetic sex offenders? - qtns2di4 on 2012-August-04 07:06:51 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: What about kinetic sex offenders? - Gimwinkle on 2012-August-04 07:04:54 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Potentially speaking - luckless on 2012-August-03 12:47:45 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 21)
- Re: Potentially speaking - Gimwinkle on 2012-August-03 05:28:59 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 20)
- Re: Potentially speaking - spell19 on 2012-August-03 22:18:19 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Potentially speaking - Gimwinkle on 2012-August-04 07:13:11 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- There is a Saudi Arabia exception - qtns2di4 on 2012-August-04 04:39:21 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Potentially speaking - Dissident on 2012-August-03 06:41:54 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 16)
- Ghod, Ghu and Bheer - Dante on 2012-August-04 08:08:36 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 9)
- fannish Ghod - manbot on 2012-August-05 09:40:03 EDT, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Fanac, not Fanning :) - Dante on 2012-August-06 09:08:28 EDT, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Ghod, Ghu and Bheer - qtns2di4 on 2012-August-04 19:28:59 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 5)
- Re: Ghod, Ghu and Bheer - Dante on 2012-August-05 08:00:01 EDT, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Thanks for the idea - griffith on 2012-August-04 20:22:35 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Re: Thanks for the idea - qtns2di4 on 2012-August-04 20:31:09 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Thanks for the idea - griffith on 2012-August-04 21:01:24 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Thanks for the idea - Gimwinkle on 2012-August-05 01:19:09 EDT, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Thanks for the idea - griffith on 2012-August-04 21:01:24 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Thanks for the idea - qtns2di4 on 2012-August-04 20:31:09 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Thanks for the info!-nt - Dissident on 2012-August-04 09:11:41 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- fannish Ghod - manbot on 2012-August-05 09:40:03 EDT, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Potentially speaking - Gimwinkle on 2012-August-03 17:07:34 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Potentially speaking - Baldur on 2012-August-03 10:00:20 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Thank you, both Baldur and Hieronymous - Dissident on 2012-August-03 15:05:43 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- word choice - Baldur on 2012-August-05 19:23:01 EDT, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: word choice - Dissident on 2012-August-05 22:59:10 EDT, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- word choice - Baldur on 2012-August-05 19:23:01 EDT, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Thank you, both Baldur and Hieronymous - Dissident on 2012-August-03 15:05:43 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Potentially speaking - Hieronymus on 2012-August-03 09:23:40 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Ghod, Ghu and Bheer - Dante on 2012-August-04 08:08:36 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 9)
- Re: Potentially speaking - spell19 on 2012-August-03 22:18:19 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Potentially speaking - Gimwinkle on 2012-August-03 05:28:59 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 20)