the right to give blowjobs

Kids really used to be like possessions that could be traded around. But you admit things are much better now than they've ever been.

What's more, we sometimes trust the word of kids too much, so for instance that if a child says a man did something sexually with them against their will, society can give the man a really hard time even if he did nothing -- maybe even send him to prison for life. The child's word can somehow get more power than an adult's word.

The state will take kids away from parents who abuse or neglect them, if the evidence is good enough.

Things are better for kids than they've ever been, and in some ways we maybe defer to them too much. I say it's time to talk about incremental improvements. We can argue about minor adjustments like letting mature 14-year-olds live independently without talking about Oppression. You say this is a travesty. It has to be conceived of as a fight for human justice, Liberation Of The Oppressed.

I might liken it to outraged citizens who say we must throw the bums out because of an unfair tax travesty -- because they are paying 32 cents too much each year! Unless... Unless you think it's important that 6-year-olds can choose to engage in sexual stuff with adults. If you think that, you'd better fight for Liberation Of The Oppressed. Big changes required big motivations.

Even after getting rid of some extra hysteria we have today, society still will not like the idea of small girls saying they were forced into giving blowjobs, men saying they consented at the time, and the girls being out of luck because of reasonable doubt. (This applies when it has been proven that sexual activity took place -- unlike the earlier case.)

Could there be any relationship between girl-attracted pedophiles demanding that particular Liberation For Girls and the fact that it would be the fulfillment of all our dreams if a girl chose us to be sexual with? No, it's impossible! Anyone who thinks that is guilty of outrageous prejudice!