GirlChat #724509
Titles
Posted by kratt on 2018-May-30 14:04:33 EDT, Wednesday
In reply to No,and there shouldn't be posted by Gimwinkle on 2018-May-30 01:59:25 EDT, Wednesday
Views: 1 Likes: 0
I follow, unfortunately, modern rules of decorum and will address most everyone as sir or madam. But a common term for both cannot be by nature of the rules of those Feudal times. Women never had official power, only by proxy."
No. Acknowledging official power as private property, and as such women as potentially (if rarely) the holders of official power was actually a feudal innovation.
A Dame might be a widow of a lord. Or a daughter and heiress of a lord.
And it might be a man who holds official power by proxy, de jure uxoris.
Another title is "mademoiselle". Meaning "a little madam".
Do you like to address a girl as Mademoiselle? She should hold power. Especially hold power over a man entrusted to fondle her fun button.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- She does... - rainbowloom on 2018-May-30 15:06:54 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 5)
- Yes! That difference - Gimwinkle on 2018-May-30 23:55:46 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 4)
- Her wishes - kratt on 2018-June-04 23:56:20 EDT, Monday - (1 / 0 / 3)
- Where would She have wanted to go? - Gimwinkle on 2018-June-12 09:24:17 EDT, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- Perform for whom? - kratt on 2018-June-12 12:59:11 EDT, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Can and can't - Gimwinkle on 2018-June-17 11:06:37 EDT, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Perform for whom? - kratt on 2018-June-12 12:59:11 EDT, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Where would She have wanted to go? - Gimwinkle on 2018-June-12 09:24:17 EDT, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- Her wishes - kratt on 2018-June-04 23:56:20 EDT, Monday - (1 / 0 / 3)
- Yes! That difference - Gimwinkle on 2018-May-30 23:55:46 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 4)