GirlChat #730684
Privileged paedophiles
Posted by kratt on 2019-September-27 17:16:42 EDT, Friday
In reply to Criteria posted by RedViolin on 2019-September-27 16:08:12 EDT, Friday
Views: 2 Likes: 0
Clearly, in 2032, preteen girls are free to enter into a sexual relationship with any arbitrary adult (hopefully, except those previously convicted of sexual assault or rape). However, for her own safety, a preteen and her parents should preferentially consider a certified pedophile.
Only in officially sanctioned relationships with certified pedophiles will girls and their parents receive legal assurances of respectful interaction, and speedy due process should those assurances ever be broken."
So, you are dividing potential love objects of preteen girls into three groups:
1) Outcasts previously convicted of rape. Preteen girls are not free to enter into sexual relationships with those. You might be confronted by a preteen girl telling "Yes, I know what he did. I still want to have sex with him. He cannot rape me for I plan to consent!" And yet your answer would be "Does not matter - you are not free to love him!"
2) Ordinary masses - see them defined by contrast with group 3)
3) Privileged paedophiles
Note that only privileged paedophiles can give a girl "legal assurances of respectful interaction". With anyone else, such assurances are deliberately denied. "Don´t have sex with him, the moment he changes his mind, you are screwed!".
-"But he´s willing to marry me, and I him! That´s a legal assurance"
-"No! Minors are not allowed to marry!"
-"But he will sit the certified paedophile tests specially for my sake!"
-"No! The tests are separate from existence of any specific relationship and having a specific relationship disqualifies him!"
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Okay! What's Your Great Proposal? - RedViolin on 2019-September-27 20:36:32 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 6)
- A little bit "bad", a lot "largely unnecessary" - rainbowloom on 2019-September-27 21:49:36 EDT, Friday - (8 / 0 / 5)
- 3rd party roles - kratt on 2019-September-28 02:49:36 EDT, Saturday - (7 / 0 / 1)
- Good post, but... - rainbowloom on 2019-September-28 03:37:26 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Your cool head prevails - RedViolin on 2019-September-27 22:24:25 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Thanks... - rainbowloom on 2019-September-27 22:46:23 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Addendum - rainbowloom on 2019-September-27 22:19:51 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- 3rd party roles - kratt on 2019-September-28 02:49:36 EDT, Saturday - (7 / 0 / 1)
- A little bit "bad", a lot "largely unnecessary" - rainbowloom on 2019-September-27 21:49:36 EDT, Friday - (8 / 0 / 5)