GirlChat #326822
...yours was illustrated.
Posted by jd420 on 2005-September-29 21:33:14 EDT, Thursday
In reply to twisted logic.... posted by Lux on 2005-September-29 20:39:59 EDT, Thursday
Views: 0 Likes: 0
(a) You're lying out your ass,
...and...
(b) all of the minimal examples you gave conform to condition (b) of the prior missive.
Have a nice day.
P.s. - if you want to establish a literal ton, you'd best fuckin' drop 2000 links without repeated content. One per pound. You're lucky I'm not doing you in ounces.
I've yet to hear any email correspondance, chat to, or have any record of these thousands (presumably) of people you have come out to in real life who have no issues with you dating their 2yo daughters...
(a) Thousands my ass.
(b) I don't give a fuck WHAT your bitch-ass problem is.
(c) (OT) She was 3, dude.
(d) So? This relates to absolutely... nothing at all. Quit with the straw man.
my argument was that the society that is always argued for has no basis in current reality
Your only argument is that discrimination is the best justification for discrimination.
Now quit it. :p
You making a threat based on something that I am free in this society to choose, is not applicable to a threat (essentially it is what it is) that is accepted by society...
Funny. I can walk down the street and find millions which are very pissed off at Christians in general.
Ergo, your assertion of difference is false. Furthermore, it would be false anyways.
...if you decide to participate in a relationship the likes of which there is no necessity for
Well, heck - I don't see Christianity as "necessity." So I suggest ya start with the lucifer-worship, buddy...
Love, OTOH, is never wrong. 1 John 4:xx will tell ya that. :p
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: ...yours was illustrated. - Lux on 2005-September-29 21:40:35 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 14)
- Re: ...yours was illustrated. (To Lux from N) - Winston101Smith on 2005-October-01 05:27:11 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Hypothesis - LostKari on 2005-September-30 15:00:33 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 7)
- Re: Hypothesis - Lux on 2005-October-01 18:29:25 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Hypothesis - Winston101Smith on 2005-October-01 05:32:29 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Hypothesis - Greenfly on 2005-September-30 15:10:06 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Yeah fire! - Winston101Smith on 2005-October-02 17:59:26 EDT, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Good Point - LostKari on 2005-September-30 16:26:49 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- So... - Winston101Smith on 2005-October-04 17:53:04 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- cases in point. - Greenfly on 2005-September-30 16:24:51 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: ...yours was illustrated. - jd420 on 2005-September-29 21:50:26 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Re: ...yours was illustrated. - Lux on 2005-September-30 04:12:43 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Re: ...yours was illustrated. - jd420 on 2005-September-30 14:16:47 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: ...yours was illustrated. - Lux on 2005-October-01 20:11:37 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- hehe... - jd420 on 2005-October-03 00:50:54 EDT, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: ...yours was illustrated. - Lux on 2005-October-01 20:11:37 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: ...yours was illustrated. - jd420 on 2005-September-30 14:16:47 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: ...yours was illustrated. - Lux on 2005-September-30 04:12:43 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- With apologies.. - jd420 on 2005-September-29 21:35:40 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)