GirlChat #354499
Re: Now here's an interesting topic..
Posted by Demosthenes on 2006-May-22 13:39:34 EDT, Monday
In reply to Re: Now here's an interesting topic.. posted by SplinterLife on 2006-May-21 19:47:25 EDT, Sunday
There are rare conditions in which a child's system will trigger insanely uncontrollable production of this chemical and the child will age in several years what they should in 70 years. The body cannot handle this, it does not grow proportionately, and they basically look like 80 year olds the size of 8 year olds. They die quite quickly.
On the other side of the coin is an equally rare condition in which children's bodies cease production of this chemical after their initial formative years and grow excedingly slowly thereafter. I saw such a girl on a tv interview not too terribly long ago and she was absolutely beautiful. She was 14 years old but was physically 8 years old.. and wasn't exactly physically growing up at a normal rate, if you understand me.
The idea is to figure out what exactly it is that causes this second condition and learn how to replicate it. That is the end-game idea for this thread. If it could be replicated to create a virtual aging statis in teleiophiles that desire it, should it be allowed? I say yes.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: Now here's an interesting topic.. - Todd on 2006-May-24 00:21:23 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 19)
- It reminds me of 'The Time Machine' - Magneto on 2006-May-24 01:07:23 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Yes, in fact, and . . . - Todd on 2006-May-24 13:26:51 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Now here's an interesting topic.. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 00:30:21 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 16)
- Re: Now here's an interesting topic.. - ILGO on 2006-May-24 12:29:12 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 15)
- Re: Now here's an interesting topic.. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 02:36:24 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 14)
- Previous post in this thread should have been... - ILGO on 2006-May-24 05:24:50 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 13)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 07:24:29 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 06:16:17 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 11)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 07:30:41 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 8)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 09:18:04 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 7)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 19:06:18 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 4)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 19:47:25 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 20:11:03 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 22:05:47 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 23:21:16 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 22:05:47 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 20:11:03 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 19:47:25 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- It is outrageous that... - Magneto on 2006-May-24 13:31:16 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: It is outrageous that... - ILGO on 2006-May-24 20:18:09 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 19:06:18 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 4)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 09:18:04 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 7)
- It is! It is!! - jd420 on 2006-May-24 07:08:55 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: It is! It is!! - Fruits-Candy on 2006-May-24 08:59:39 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Previous post in this thread should have been. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 07:30:41 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 8)
- Previous post in this thread should have been... - ILGO on 2006-May-24 05:24:50 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 13)
- Re: Now here's an interesting topic.. - Demosthenes on 2006-May-24 02:36:24 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 14)
- Re: Now here's an interesting topic.. - ILGO on 2006-May-24 12:29:12 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 15)
- It reminds me of 'The Time Machine' - Magneto on 2006-May-24 01:07:23 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 1)