Re: No kidding?

GirlChat #563036

Start A New Topic! Date Index Thread Index

Re: No kidding?

Posted by manbot on 2012-September-15 17:35:25 EDT, Saturday

In reply to Re: No kidding? posted by lee lette on 2012-September-15 16:04:30 EDT, Saturday

Views: 2 Likes: 0

I find it improbable that all children would have been unwilling.
Is grooming necessary for a child to engage in sex-play with either another child or an adult?

What unbiased evidence would you accept? You seem to accept Masha Allen's testimony. In no case can we view the actual evidence.

What unbiased evidence did you need to accept revictimization hypothesis?

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses

Re: No kidding? - lee lette on 2012-September-15 18:21:10 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 11)
- Exactly - qtns2di4 on 2012-September-16 01:34:35 EDT, Sunday - (2 / 0 / 2)
  - Re: Exactly - lee lette on 2012-September-16 16:26:36 EDT, Sunday - (2 / 0 / 1)
    - Re: Exactly - qtns2di4 on 2012-September-16 21:20:41 EDT, Sunday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: No kidding? - manbot on 2012-September-15 22:19:00 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 7)
  - Re: No kidding? - lee lette on 2012-September-16 16:10:39 EDT, Sunday - (2 / 0 / 6)
    - Re: No kidding? - Dante on 2012-September-18 11:04:31 EDT, Tuesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
    - Re: No kidding? - qtns2di4 on 2012-September-16 20:55:25 EDT, Sunday - (2 / 0 / 2)
      - Re: No kidding? - Markaba on 2012-September-17 01:51:15 EDT, Monday - (1 / 0 / 1)
        
        Agreed - qtns2di4 on 2012-September-17 08:58:31 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 0)
    - Re: No kidding? - manbot on 2012-September-16 20:17:08 EDT, Sunday - (2 / 0 / 1)
      - Re: No kidding? - lee lette on 2012-September-17 16:18:20 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 0)