GirlChat #560993

Start A New Topic!  Date Index  Thread Index

Re: Are you a Caveman?

Posted by GL_in_lyrics on 2012-August-10 11:13:47 EDT, Friday
In reply to Re: Are you a Caveman? posted by lee lette on 2012-August-10 10:39:49 EDT, Friday
  Views: 2    Likes: 0     
Another rather strange post.

I would argue that incest is not necessarily wrong. Perhaps bestiality isn't, either? But the others you mentioned are quite strange. Murder, rape, necrophilia, etc? I fail to see how this compares to a loving relationship between two consenting individuals. Again, your premise assumes that sex is inherently harmful to children, which has nothing to do with the point you're making. The harms of rape, murder, necrophilia, etc, are quite evident, and afterall, how many people do you see arguing they should be legal? How common are they? Yet we see the CL movement growing yearly, and it's also clear there are a great deal of kids who want to have sex, even if you want to blame that on society's promiscuity. There's a growing demand for it, and obviously it's more normal than murder, rape, necrophilia. You might argue the former two are more popular, but again, who is arguing they should be legal?

You might poke holes into what I'm saying due to believing incest and bestiality should possibly be accepted, but still, that's hardly the same as condoning a consensual heterosexual relationship between a man and a young girl, or even a consensual homosexual relationship between a man and a young boy. And of course, there's female pedosexuality as well, which I can see no reason to condemn. Though with homosexual pedophilic relations, the argument should be based on whether or not one agrees with homosexuality.

I take great offense if you equate things such as murder, rape, necrophilia, or even incest, to a regular relationship between an adult and young person who do not share family bloodline. The differences are fundamental. Your sole criteria is based on something as restrictive as age. And one cannot help their age any more than they can help their race, skin color, nationality, gender, or sexual orientation.

I feel that you have an obsession with normality, Lee Lette. You seem to be obsessed with conformity and basing laws and regulations on what a majority percentage agrees on and desires. And as I've said before, this is based upon an assumption that pedophilia and child sexuality is not something experienced by the majority. Your argument crumbles if this is proven to be true, while our arguments do not crumble if we're wrong on that (even though many of us do not believe the majority shares this attraction).

Furthermore, I would argue that with something like necrophilia, maybe it shouldn't be banned in all cases? What if someone willingly agrees to let their lover have sex with them when they die? Many questions have to be asked here. I fail to see why those with necrophilic fantasies, rape fantasies, etc, should be discriminated against. But it's interesting, isn't it, that there isn't a witch hunt against something as "evil" as necrophilia? Again, this shows the popularity of something like this vs. pedophilia and child sex. And yes, even children are being persecuted for their own sexuality, even with other children. Toning down the persecution is only going to enable these deviant "perverts" to get their way. So again - you can't have your cake and it it too. The less pedophilia is persecuted, the more child sex is going to be occurring.

I find it interesting that you claim to be against the American government and Empire, but if it wasn't for the American Empire, I doubt very much that pedophilia and child sex would be seen the same as they are today. The predicament us CLs are in would probably be much less intense, if it would exist at all.

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses