Why does it seem that whenever a serious debate gets going on this board, the people defending the "pro adult/child sex" side of things put up a tonne of conditions that they then fall back on and say "in this case, this situation - there is no harm whatsoever, therefore my point is valid"?

Then people wonder why no one takes us seriously. They are going to laugh at you if you say "in a society where children are totally liberated, and adult/child sex is acepted, adult child sex will not be harmful".. why? Because that is Very much detached from reality as it exists today as to be totally hypothetical, and when it comes to serious debate, hypothetical utopian scenarios have no weight.

The same with the recent, "If the adult and child are Fully informed of the reaction of society to their relationship and continue to go into it anyway, if society finds out about the relationship the child does not have to be brainwashed into believeing it was abuse".... When it comes to adult/child relationships of a sexual kind these days, most of them are intrafamilial because frankly - police dont seem to give a fuck. In other situations, the adult loves the child and the child loves the adult, the issue of "society finding out later" never comes up - why? Because it may not be the first thing on their mind, nor may it be relevant to the adult.

When someone argues that the blame for the harm cannot totally rest on a society that makes it taboo, due to the adult knowing this is taboo yet still going through with it - making a hypothetical jump through hoops 5 point "if they match all of these then my view is correct" argument, carries no weight.

And as i said above - that is why no one takes you guys seriously.