magical thinking

GirlChat #721697

Start A New Topic! Date Index Thread Index

magical thinking

Posted by Baldur on 2017-December-03 00:10:39 EST, Sunday

In reply to Many differences posted by EthanEdwards on 2017-December-02 15:23:27 EST, Saturday

"An end to shame around bodies and sex, an end to forbidding masturbation, an end to prohibiting sexual play among people of the same age, comprehensive sex education (but not the "lab course" version) -- I and lots of sex-positive people are in favor of those things. The child can even have special friendships with adults, who might be pedophiles, but no sexual activity is permitted."

How on Earth is this supposed to make one bit of sense?

The exact same activity is healthy or harmful solely depending on the age of one's partner, which may not even be easily determined! It requires a belief in magic that transforms each person on a birthday to be determined by their local government.

I understand the practical necessities of putting up with the current state of affairs for now - but to pretend that this makes sense? An utter joke.

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses

Re: 'lab course' version - Lil'Grundoon on 2017-December-03 00:44:16 EST, Sunday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- puppy love - Baldy on 2017-December-03 11:34:25 EST, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 0)
practical cost-benefit stuff - EthanEdwards on 2017-December-03 00:21:31 EST, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 55)
- "Anti-contact" is not pragmatism, it is defeatism - Explorer on 2017-December-04 10:23:23 EST, Monday - (1 / 0 / 50)
  - * sniff * My work is done ;p - Dante on 2017-December-06 11:41:37 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
  - Bypass reality and jump to WIN - Dante on 2017-December-06 11:22:31 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
  - disagree on what 'anti-contact' implies - EthanEdwards on 2017-December-04 16:17:56 EST, Monday - (1 / 0 / 46)
    - A few things (yes, only a few) - Dissident on 2018-January-07 18:27:10 EST, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 0)
    - It is currently illegal for an adult to have sex - - greenfield on 2017-December-13 16:22:07 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
    - Accepting paedosexuality will decrease real rape - Explorer on 2017-December-13 13:36:02 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
    - "itching to rape kids" - summerdays on 2017-December-07 15:08:12 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 10)
      - the public thinks that, yes - EthanEdwards on 2017-December-07 16:32:01 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 9)
        
        Thank VP's propagandists - manbot on 2017-December-08 20:43:20 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 5)
        
        no... - EthanEdwards on 2017-December-09 12:38:42 EST, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 4)
        
        Stats: Pedophiles safer than Non-pedophiles - Baldur on 2017-December-09 23:41:48 EST, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 3)
        
        I don't doubt it at all - hieronymus on 2017-December-23 13:24:16 EST, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        I doubt it - EthanEdwards on 2017-December-10 01:43:02 EST, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 1)
        
        studies: 20% to 32% of men attracted to LGs - Baldur on 2017-December-10 05:15:28 EST, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        Saying so online is not the same - rainbowloom on 2017-December-07 16:40:53 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 2)
        
        Agreed - Dante on 2017-December-07 23:55:32 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        .... But if you want to base your position - rainbowloom on 2017-December-07 16:46:20 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 0)
    - Disagree on life - rainbowloom on 2017-December-05 23:27:50 EST, Tuesday - (2 / 0 / 27)
      - rebuttals - EthanEdwards on 2017-December-06 11:55:58 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 25)
        
        nature of girls vs chattel slaves. - manbot on 2017-December-08 21:06:53 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        Why speculate? - Dante on 2017-December-07 15:28:26 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        Really? - hieronymus on 2017-December-07 13:54:21 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        TL;DR: - rainbowloom on 2017-December-06 16:10:34 EST, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
        
        rebuttals - rainbowloom on 2017-December-06 14:49:46 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 20)
        
        winners/losers of adult/child sex - EthanEdwards on 2017-December-06 16:34:46 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 19)
        
        positive memories - Baldur on 2017-December-07 14:43:00 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        The fallible nature of memory - rainbowloom on 2017-December-06 20:18:28 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 17)
        
        What Ethan never considers - Dissident on 2018-January-07 18:52:36 EST, Sunday - (2 / 0 / 0)
        
        italics, italics - EthanEdwards on 2017-December-07 17:50:09 EST, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 14)
        
        faith in anti-pedophilia - manbot on 2017-December-08 22:36:38 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 1)
        
        explanation - EthanEdwards on 2017-December-09 13:01:48 EST, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        More BS - rainbowloom on 2017-December-08 00:58:03 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 10)
        
        Sex as poison for all - Dante on 2017-December-08 12:40:13 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        winding down... - EthanEdwards on 2017-December-08 11:33:34 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 3)
        
        Diminshing returns? - rainbowloom on 2017-December-08 21:52:35 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 1)
        
        Credit where its not due - Dante on 2017-December-10 22:28:56 EST, Sunday - (2 / 0 / 0)
        
        Downwind from the dump - Dante on 2017-December-08 13:01:19 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        Your thought error in terms of variables - rainbowloom on 2017-December-08 07:07:38 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 4)
        
        Henny, is dat you? nt - Lil'Grundoon on 2017-December-08 13:04:27 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        Oops - the first section should look like this: - rainbowloom on 2017-December-08 07:15:22 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 2)
        
        And switch the dependent and independent - rainbowloom on 2017-December-08 07:17:55 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 1)
        
        Nevermind - rainbowloom on 2017-December-08 07:20:21 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        OMG, actual substance - rainbowloom on 2017-December-07 18:35:20 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        Indeedy - Dante on 2017-December-07 15:11:03 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 0)
      - 5th paragraph from the bottom is a quote [nt] - rainbowloom on 2017-December-05 23:32:10 EST, Tuesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
    - of you two, - hieronymus on 2017-December-04 20:02:45 EST, Monday - (1 / 0 / 1)
      - Anyway... - griffith on 2017-December-04 20:42:49 EST, Monday - (1 / 0 / 0)
    - Why don't you ban this one? - griffith on 2017-December-04 16:51:50 EST, Monday - (1 / 0 / 1)
      - Agreed! nt - GL_in_lyrics on 2017-December-04 17:21:26 EST, Monday - (1 / 0 / 0)
  - well said - Baldur on 2017-December-04 13:03:13 EST, Monday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- the thing is - hieronymus on 2017-December-03 01:59:29 EST, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 3)
  - Fortunately - rainbowloom on 2017-December-03 15:38:19 EST, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 2)
    - do you mean that - hieronymus on 2017-December-04 02:02:30 EST, Monday - (1 / 0 / 1)
      - [nt] - rainbowloom on 2017-December-05 20:46:12 EST, Tuesday - (2 / 0 / 0)