GirlChat #559662
For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur
Posted by lee lette on 2012-July-18 10:51:46 EDT, Wednesday
In reply to Exceptionalism posted by Dante on 2012-July-17 23:00:57 EDT, Tuesday
Regarding our thinking, I think much the same applies to paedophilia since unless one is capable of removing the sexual attraction and looking at the issue from the perspective of one without such an attraction then it will probably not be possible to perceive paedophilia and all surrounding issues differently. What determines how we see issues and form our opinions will vary no doubt but is largely related to how much information we have acquired over the years, the breadth and depth of this information, and how much credence we give to such information together with our ability to make sense of it all. No doubt many here will have seen the same information that I have seen but essentially come to different conclusions just as we do in the religious context. I will grant I am not the best at framing my reasoning in a decent intellectual manner but often I will spot flaws in reasoning or in areas where such reasoning might not apply.
I know we do tend to think in a binary fashion and this is not often helpful but for the case of religious belief it is really a basic requirement. One might tolerate every religious belief - but we might feel miffed when their beliefs infringe on our liberties such as Sunday opening or the right to terminate one's life though - but it is not possible really to hold in one's mind a religious belief and a non-religious belief at the same time. It is possible to be agnostic, which I am with regard to some matters, but one has essentially to run one's life with either a religious view or a non-religious view. I think much the same applies to paedophilia and unless one is able to step outside the sexual attraction then it is as likely for a paedophile to do a 180 degree turn as it is for a religious person to suddenly abandon their religion, although fortunately that does happen quite frequently.
Because I am aware of my limitations I think you will find that many intellectual arguments and the finer points of reasoning will be wasted on me so it is probably fruitless effort although I do appreciate the attempts. Since I do myself still have such an attraction to children I am not a particularly judgemental person with regard to this issue and so I hope I do come across as courteous and respectful to the members here even if I will disagree on many points. I know there are some very intelligent people on this forum but I personally would rather see them applying their minds in other ways rather than trying to defend what I see as a faulty attraction but I will grant the possibility I am just as wrong on this issue if those here would do the same. I may be wrong in my perception of my attraction but I have come to a satisfactory resolution such that I accept this, that it might fade away completely perhaps later in life but even if it doesn't it does not and will not cause me problems or heartache since it is playing much less importance than it once did. Much of the compulsion regarding various activities are simply no longer there anymore and I can take or leave many things much like I did before I became so driven by the attraction.
Since it is unlikely that any here will be able to change my mind on these issues and I see little prospect for doing the same regarding their views it might be best not to debate too intensely since I am really here to learn more about this attraction than anything else.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - Dissident on 2012-July-19 05:16:01 EDT, Thursday - (3 / 0 / 12)
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - lee lette on 2012-July-20 00:14:22 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 5)
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - Dissident on 2012-July-19 17:23:33 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 4)
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - lee lette on 2012-July-20 11:35:20 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-19 17:27:05 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - Dissident on 2012-July-19 17:23:33 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 4)
- Re: For dissisent if I may! - rocinante on 2012-July-19 15:42:43 EDT, Thursday - (3 / 0 / 5)
- 'Dissisent' responds :-) - Dissident on 2012-July-19 18:25:49 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- 'Recruiting' = 'Grooming' - Dante on 2012-July-19 18:20:31 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: 'Recruiting' = 'Grooming' - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-20 01:30:52 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- what? - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-19 16:51:44 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: not a monster - rocinante on 2012-July-19 17:11:01 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - lee lette on 2012-July-20 00:14:22 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 5)
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - Dante on 2012-July-18 22:11:17 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 5)
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - lee lette on 2012-July-20 00:32:25 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 4)
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-19 16:14:30 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- I can't argue since I'm no philosopher. - nt - lee lette on 2012-July-20 11:38:21 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: I can't argue since I'm no philosopher. - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-20 19:23:16 EDT, Friday - (3 / 0 / 1)
- Re: I can't argue since I'm no philosopher. - lee lette on 2012-July-21 10:06:58 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: I can't argue since I'm no philosopher. - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-20 19:23:16 EDT, Friday - (3 / 0 / 1)
- I can't argue since I'm no philosopher. - nt - lee lette on 2012-July-20 11:38:21 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-19 16:14:30 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - lee lette on 2012-July-20 00:32:25 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 4)
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-18 19:49:42 EDT, Wednesday - (2 / 0 / 42)
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - lee lette on 2012-July-20 00:54:16 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 40)
- I am Abraham's Naughty Boy - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-19 17:22:28 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- No atheists in trenches? Bullshit. - griffith on 2012-July-19 14:06:10 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 38)
- Re: No atheists in trenches? Bullshit. - lee lette on 2012-July-20 11:50:00 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: No atheists in trenches? Bullshit. - Dissident on 2012-July-20 21:46:49 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: No atheists in trenches? Bullshit. - Dissident on 2012-July-19 17:45:37 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 26)
- Observer Effect - Dante on 2012-July-19 18:41:23 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 22)
- Straw Man Effect - Dissident on 2012-July-20 06:16:12 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 21)
- 3 Quantum researchers ( not ) vs 1 ( real ) - Dante on 2012-July-20 11:06:04 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 20)
- Excellent post--NT - Markaba on 2012-July-20 21:51:48 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- You think that... - Dissident on 2012-July-20 22:43:08 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: You think that... - Markaba on 2012-July-21 04:19:11 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- You think that... - Dissident on 2012-July-20 22:43:08 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- The interconnectedness of all research - Dissident on 2012-July-20 21:24:44 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 10)
- Re: The interconnectedness of all research - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-21 08:49:08 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: The interconnectedness of all research - hieronymus on 2012-July-24 01:43:00 EDT, Tuesday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Keeping it shorter and sweeter. - Dante on 2012-July-21 08:34:41 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Keeping it shorter and sweeter. - Markaba on 2012-July-21 09:04:49 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: The interconnectedness of all research - Markaba on 2012-July-20 22:10:43 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 5)
- Yes, but are there any poeple here? NT - griffith on 2012-July-21 11:20:56 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- We are all Poeps - Lil'Grundoon on 2012-July-21 21:20:47 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Hail Eris! -nt- - Baldy on 2012-July-23 00:06:18 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Like--NT - Markaba on 2012-July-23 23:58:24 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Hail Eris! -nt- - Baldy on 2012-July-23 00:06:18 EDT, Monday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- We are all Poeps - Lil'Grundoon on 2012-July-21 21:20:47 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: The interconnectedness of all research - Dissident on 2012-July-20 22:29:57 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Yes, but are there any poeple here? NT - griffith on 2012-July-21 11:20:56 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 3)
- Re: The interconnectedness of all research - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-21 08:49:08 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- ...enter into a bar. (nt) - Sexiest GLer of All Time on 2012-July-20 19:27:01 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 3)
- Re: ...enter into a bar. - Lil'Grundoon on 2012-July-21 07:42:45 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- A Higgs boson walks into a church . . . - Markaba on 2012-July-21 09:12:59 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- LOLs. God-Particle, indeed :) NT - Dante on 2012-July-21 09:18:01 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- A Higgs boson walks into a church . . . - Markaba on 2012-July-21 09:12:59 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: ...enter into a bar. - Lil'Grundoon on 2012-July-21 07:42:45 EDT, Saturday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- Re: 3 Quantum researchers ( not ) vs 1 ( real ) - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-20 18:53:22 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: 3 Quantum researchers ( not ) vs 1 ( real ) - Dissident on 2012-July-20 22:21:43 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Excellent post--NT - Markaba on 2012-July-20 21:51:48 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 2)
- 3 Quantum researchers ( not ) vs 1 ( real ) - Dante on 2012-July-20 11:06:04 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 20)
- Straw Man Effect - Dissident on 2012-July-20 06:16:12 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 21)
- Re: No atheists in trenches? Bullshit. - griffith on 2012-July-19 18:40:30 EDT, Thursday - (3 / 0 / 2)
- Atheist! - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-20 12:53:19 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- I hope you feel better soon, old friend - Dissident on 2012-July-20 04:54:57 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Observer Effect - Dante on 2012-July-19 18:41:23 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 22)
- Re: No atheists in trenches? Bullshit. - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-19 16:22:31 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 8)
- Re: No atheists in trenches? Bullshit. - Dante on 2012-July-19 18:09:11 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- I was not criticizing you or lee lette -- - griffith on 2012-July-19 16:28:47 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 6)
- Re: I was not criticizing you or lee lette -- - Dissident on 2012-July-19 18:28:57 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 5)
- False analogy - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-20 12:43:03 EDT, Friday - (3 / 0 / 4)
- Re: False analogy - Lil'Grundoon on 2012-July-20 09:03:06 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: False analogy - Sexiest GLer of All Time on 2012-July-20 18:44:43 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: False analogy - Dissident on 2012-July-20 06:25:40 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Re: False analogy - Dante on 2012-July-20 08:59:37 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: False analogy - Lil'Grundoon on 2012-July-20 09:03:06 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- False analogy - qtns2di4 on 2012-July-20 12:43:03 EDT, Friday - (3 / 0 / 4)
- Re: I was not criticizing you or lee lette -- - Dissident on 2012-July-19 18:28:57 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 5)
- Re: No atheists in trenches? Bullshit. - lee lette on 2012-July-20 11:50:00 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 1)
- Hi, qtns-nt - Dissident on 2012-July-19 05:18:58 EDT, Thursday - (2 / 0 / 0)
- Re: For dante, qtns2di4 and Baldur - lee lette on 2012-July-20 00:54:16 EDT, Friday - (2 / 0 / 40)