GirlChat #517398
What scholars?
Posted by Lateralus on 2010-December-13 15:59:36 EST, Monday
In reply to Relax, Furbydad; you have not sinned posted by Seamus on 2010-December-13 11:23:58 EST, Monday
Views: 0 Likes: 0
I keep seeing this point resurface here time and time again, but no one ever seems to post any evidence to back it up. Can you quote some of these scholars? But even if a 1000 biblical scholars believed it, it would be there conceit. There's no solid evidence that Mary even existed, much less that she got pregnant at age 13. Honestly, I think a lot of people at GC just like the sound of this.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: What scholars? - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 05:12:39 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Er, did you read the entire thread? - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 05:27:11 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Er, did you read the entire thread? - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-19 00:05:35 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Er, did you read the entire thread? - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 05:27:11 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: What scholars? - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 10:48:08 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 12)
- Re: What scholars? - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 18:10:25 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 11)
- Re: What scholars? - Baldur on 2010-December-16 16:50:38 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- How do you claim to speak for me? - Seamus on 2010-December-15 10:43:21 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: How do you claim to speak for me? - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 17:52:45 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: What scholars? - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 20:24:11 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 7)
- Re: What scholars? - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 21:19:52 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
- On the contrary, that is exactly what we are doing - Seamus on 2010-December-15 11:07:13 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 5)
- Re: On the contrary, that is exactly what we are doing - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 18:31:58 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Lateralus, ask your babysitter to read this slowly - Seamus on 2010-December-17 09:07:14 EST, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- I would say we are - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-16 02:23:20 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: I would say we are - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 02:46:41 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: I would say we are - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-16 09:39:01 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: I would say we are - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 02:46:41 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: On the contrary, that is exactly what we are doing - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 18:31:58 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- On the contrary, that is exactly what we are doing - Seamus on 2010-December-15 11:07:13 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 5)
- Re: What scholars? - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 21:19:52 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
- Re: What scholars? - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 18:10:25 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 11)
- You are missing the point - Seamus on 2010-December-14 05:58:10 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Re: You are missin)g the point - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 07:28:30 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Wrong again! - Seamus on 2010-December-15 10:40:28 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Wrong again! - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 17:49:14 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Still wrong! - Seamus on 2010-December-17 08:32:24 EST, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Wrong again! - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 17:49:14 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Wrong again! - Seamus on 2010-December-15 10:40:28 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: You are missin)g the point - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 07:28:30 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- One of them... - gimwinkle on 2010-December-13 17:24:49 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 44)
- Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 17:51:50 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 43)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Scotty on 2010-December-14 06:09:15 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 36)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 07:19:10 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 35)
- The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Seamus on 2010-December-15 10:59:18 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 27)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 18:12:08 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 26)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-16 02:13:31 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 25)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 03:23:33 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 03:16:58 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 23)
- A few points for Lat... - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 03:56:01 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 18)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-18 18:30:17 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 11)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 20:04:04 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 10)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-18 22:23:55 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 9)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-19 02:39:48 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 8)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-19 03:27:19 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 7)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-19 04:44:27 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-19 08:57:34 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-19 19:10:10 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-19 07:58:17 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Plyushkin on 2010-December-20 06:05:49 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-19 08:57:34 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- What are those things in your sig pic? - Plyushkin on 2010-December-19 03:37:04 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Yes - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-19 06:38:23 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-19 04:44:27 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-19 03:27:19 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 7)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-19 02:39:48 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 8)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-18 22:23:55 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 9)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 20:04:04 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 10)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-18 17:32:40 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-18 04:21:08 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- You pretty much have it - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 05:45:19 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: You pretty much have it - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 11:56:28 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 04:36:07 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- government - Baldur on 2010-December-18 17:44:25 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- You pretty much have it - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 05:45:19 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-18 18:30:17 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 11)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-16 03:49:07 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 04:43:59 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 04:11:21 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-16 07:52:54 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 04:43:59 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- A few points for Lat... - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 03:56:01 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 18)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-16 02:13:31 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 25)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 18:12:08 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 26)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 11:03:47 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 17:44:51 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- There is NO burden of proof upon us - Seamus on 2010-December-15 11:14:19 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: There is NO burden of proof upon us - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 21:57:28 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- You insist on showing your ass - Seamus on 2010-December-17 08:39:39 EST, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: There is NO burden of proof upon us - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 21:57:28 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- There is NO burden of proof upon us - Seamus on 2010-December-15 11:14:19 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 17:44:51 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - gimwinkle on 2010-December-14 09:53:39 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Correction - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 07:22:34 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Seamus on 2010-December-15 10:59:18 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 27)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 07:19:10 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 35)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Baldur on 2010-December-13 18:09:53 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 5)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - gimwinkle on 2010-December-13 18:21:23 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 18:16:37 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 10:55:30 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Yeah, that sounds right--thanks!--NT - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 18:00:31 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Grrrr . . . --NT - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 18:17:28 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 10:55:30 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Scotty on 2010-December-14 06:09:15 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 36)
- Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 17:51:50 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 43)
- 'Their conceit' I meant, not 'there conceit'--NT - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 16:00:42 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)