Relax, Furbydad; you have not sinned

GirlChat #517391

Start A New Topic! Date Index Thread Index

Relax, Furbydad; you have not sinned

Posted by Seamus on 2010-December-13 11:23:58 EST, Monday

In reply to Quandry at Mass today (GM!) posted by Furbydad on 2010-December-13 05:37:14 EST, Monday

Views: 0 Likes: 0

Appreciating beauty is how we thank God for creating it.

Besides, Biblical scholars are almost unanimous in placing Mary's age at not more than 14, more probably 13, and possibly as young as 12 - the age at which a Jewish girl undergoes Bat Mitzvah, or the rite of passage into adulthood - when she gave birth to Jesus, which means that she could have been as young as 11 when God chose her to be the mother of His son.

So, since God is a pedophile, why should you worry?

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses

What scholars? - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 15:59:36 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 67)
- Re: What scholars? - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 05:12:39 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 2)
  - Er, did you read the entire thread? - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 05:27:11 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
    - Re: Er, did you read the entire thread? - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-19 00:05:35 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: What scholars? - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 10:48:08 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 12)
  - Re: What scholars? - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 18:10:25 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 11)
    - Re: What scholars? - Baldur on 2010-December-16 16:50:38 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
    - How do you claim to speak for me? - Seamus on 2010-December-15 10:43:21 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
      - Re: How do you claim to speak for me? - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 17:52:45 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
    - Re: What scholars? - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 20:24:11 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 7)
      - Re: What scholars? - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 21:19:52 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
        
        On the contrary, that is exactly what we are doing - Seamus on 2010-December-15 11:07:13 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 5)
        
        Re: On the contrary, that is exactly what we are doing - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 18:31:58 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 4)
        
        Lateralus, ask your babysitter to read this slowly - Seamus on 2010-December-17 09:07:14 EST, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
        
        I would say we are - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-16 02:23:20 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 2)
        
        Re: I would say we are - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 02:46:41 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 1)
        
        Re: I would say we are - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-16 09:39:01 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- You are missing the point - Seamus on 2010-December-14 05:58:10 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 4)
  - Re: You are missin)g the point - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 07:28:30 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
    - Wrong again! - Seamus on 2010-December-15 10:40:28 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
      - Re: Wrong again! - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 17:49:14 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
        
        Still wrong! - Seamus on 2010-December-17 08:32:24 EST, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- One of them... - gimwinkle on 2010-December-13 17:24:49 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 44)
  - Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 17:51:50 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 43)
    - Re: Yes, but . . . - Scotty on 2010-December-14 06:09:15 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 36)
      - Re: Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 07:19:10 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 35)
        
        The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Seamus on 2010-December-15 10:59:18 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 27)
        
        Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 18:12:08 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 26)
        
        Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-16 02:13:31 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 25)
        
        Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 03:23:33 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
        
        Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 03:16:58 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 23)
        
        A few points for Lat... - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 03:56:01 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 18)
        
        Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-18 18:30:17 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 11)
        
        Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 20:04:04 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 10)
        
        Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-18 22:23:55 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 9)
        
        Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-19 02:39:48 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 8)
        
        Re: A few points for Lat... - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-19 03:27:19 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 7)
        
        Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-19 04:44:27 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 4)
        
        Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-19 08:57:34 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
        
        Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-19 19:10:10 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
        
        Re: A few points for Lat... - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-19 07:58:17 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
        
        Re: A few points for Lat... - Plyushkin on 2010-December-20 06:05:49 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)
        
        What are those things in your sig pic? - Plyushkin on 2010-December-19 03:37:04 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
        
        Yes - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-19 06:38:23 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
        
        Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-18 17:32:40 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
        
        Re: A few points for Lat... - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-18 04:21:08 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 4)
        
        You pretty much have it - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 05:45:19 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
        
        Re: You pretty much have it - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 11:56:28 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
        
        Re: A few points for Lat... - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 04:36:07 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
        
        government - Baldur on 2010-December-18 17:44:25 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
        
        Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-16 03:49:07 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 3)
        
        Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 04:43:59 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 2)
        
        Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 04:11:21 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
        
        Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-16 07:52:54 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
        
        Re: Yes, but . . . - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 11:03:47 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 4)
        
        Re: Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 17:44:51 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
        
        There is NO burden of proof upon us - Seamus on 2010-December-15 11:14:19 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
        
        Re: There is NO burden of proof upon us - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 21:57:28 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
        
        You insist on showing your ass - Seamus on 2010-December-17 08:39:39 EST, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
        
        Re: Yes, but . . . - gimwinkle on 2010-December-14 09:53:39 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
        
        Correction - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 07:22:34 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
    - Re: Yes, but . . . - Baldur on 2010-December-13 18:09:53 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 5)
      - Re: Yes, but . . . - gimwinkle on 2010-December-13 18:21:23 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)
      - Re: Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 18:16:37 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 3)
        
        Re: Yes, but . . . - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 10:55:30 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
        
        Yeah, that sounds right--thanks!--NT - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 18:00:31 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
        
        Grrrr . . . --NT - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 18:17:28 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- 'Their conceit' I meant, not 'there conceit'--NT - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 16:00:42 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)