GirlChat #517379
Quandry at Mass today (GM!)
Posted by Furbydad on 2010-December-13 05:37:14 EST, Monday
Views: 0 Likes: 0
She came over wondering what this old man wanted.
"S*****, you are the most Beautiful girl in the whole Parish!"
She just smiled and ran off; and that was that.
Today in Mass, she sat a few pews behind me and on the other side of the aisle. She wore a short green Dress, definitely not an American style outfit. Her family must have brought these clothes from overseas.
I was careful not to look at her very much, as the ladies behind me would think it was odd an old man would be watching a preteen girl. But I caught a glance of her everytime we had to stand up and sit down. She seemed to be watching me as well.
It was time for Communion, and though I was in the state of Sin, for lusting these little girls, I still went up and received. I figure it isn't a big enough sin to require confession over every time I see a girl.
S**** went up to, slightly behind me, and walked clockwise around the pews as I walked counterclockwise into my pew.
Just as I was to my place and ready to sit down, I saw S*****. I still had the Communion wafer in my mouth. which we believe is the Body of Jesus Christ. This is the most solemn moment in Mass, and one that should be spent in Prayer giving thanks.
But into the pew across from me went S****, and my eyes could not release her. As she prepared to sit down herself, she lifte her right leg Way up giving me a view all the way up her dress/ She seemed to stop there, showing me the wonderful view of all of her legs up to her panties. But since it was a considerable distance, about 50 feet, I couldn't see if she had panties on. I didn't see any.
Had she gone to Mass without Panties? and Why? She seemed to be looking at me as her leg was up, knowing right where my eyes were focused.
But I was undergoing extreme grief at this moment too. I still had not swallowed the Communion wafer, and this was SIN at it's highest!
S**** finally put her leg down and resumed her position in the pew. I knelt down and grieved, that I would sin at this very moment. But it was one of those times where I was not about to look away. This was a once in a lifetime chance to see the girl who I desire so's panties, or even better, Lack of Panties!!
It all happened so fast, yet I retain those cherished seconds in my mind forever. It is if she wanted me to see, and her with a Communion wafer in her mouth as well. Mass is NOT the place for such activities!!!
But I cannot confess to the Priest. he knows me too well, and I would lose all favor in the parish. I need to go to a church far away that no one will know me at to confess.
I am about to go to sleep, and I have installed some little pink panties on my special Pillow Laurie. She is ready for her nightly molestation, and tonight it will be very special. Fantasies of the things I want to do with S**** will be played out. Of course, NONE of these will ever occur, as She is an innocent little girl and I am a very elderly man. She seems so innocent, but has this Sultry look in her eyes, like she knows just how Tempting she is. Maybe today she Wanted to show me a view up her dress. Just maybe.
Time to satisfy my pillow Laurie!
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: Quandry at Mass today (GM!) - griffith on 2010-December-13 20:32:17 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Quandry at Mass today (GM!) - gimwinkle on 2010-December-13 21:18:12 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Quandry at Mass today (GM!) - psyopuk on 2010-December-13 18:09:59 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Relax, Furbydad; you have not sinned - Seamus on 2010-December-13 11:23:58 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 68)
- What scholars? - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 15:59:36 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 67)
- Re: What scholars? - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 05:12:39 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Er, did you read the entire thread? - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 05:27:11 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Er, did you read the entire thread? - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-19 00:05:35 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Er, did you read the entire thread? - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 05:27:11 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: What scholars? - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 10:48:08 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 12)
- Re: What scholars? - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 18:10:25 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 11)
- Re: What scholars? - Baldur on 2010-December-16 16:50:38 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- How do you claim to speak for me? - Seamus on 2010-December-15 10:43:21 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: How do you claim to speak for me? - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 17:52:45 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: What scholars? - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 20:24:11 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 7)
- Re: What scholars? - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 21:19:52 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
- On the contrary, that is exactly what we are doing - Seamus on 2010-December-15 11:07:13 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 5)
- Re: On the contrary, that is exactly what we are doing - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 18:31:58 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Lateralus, ask your babysitter to read this slowly - Seamus on 2010-December-17 09:07:14 EST, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- I would say we are - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-16 02:23:20 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: I would say we are - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 02:46:41 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: I would say we are - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-16 09:39:01 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: I would say we are - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 02:46:41 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: On the contrary, that is exactly what we are doing - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 18:31:58 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- On the contrary, that is exactly what we are doing - Seamus on 2010-December-15 11:07:13 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 5)
- Re: What scholars? - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 21:19:52 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
- Re: What scholars? - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 18:10:25 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 11)
- You are missing the point - Seamus on 2010-December-14 05:58:10 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Re: You are missin)g the point - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 07:28:30 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Wrong again! - Seamus on 2010-December-15 10:40:28 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Wrong again! - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 17:49:14 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Still wrong! - Seamus on 2010-December-17 08:32:24 EST, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Wrong again! - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 17:49:14 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Wrong again! - Seamus on 2010-December-15 10:40:28 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: You are missin)g the point - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 07:28:30 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- One of them... - gimwinkle on 2010-December-13 17:24:49 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 44)
- Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 17:51:50 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 43)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Scotty on 2010-December-14 06:09:15 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 36)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 07:19:10 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 35)
- The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Seamus on 2010-December-15 10:59:18 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 27)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 18:12:08 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 26)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-16 02:13:31 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 25)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 03:23:33 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 03:16:58 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 23)
- A few points for Lat... - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 03:56:01 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 18)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-18 18:30:17 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 11)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 20:04:04 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 10)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-18 22:23:55 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 9)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-19 02:39:48 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 8)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-19 03:27:19 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 7)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-19 04:44:27 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-19 08:57:34 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-19 19:10:10 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-19 07:58:17 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Plyushkin on 2010-December-20 06:05:49 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-19 08:57:34 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- What are those things in your sig pic? - Plyushkin on 2010-December-19 03:37:04 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Yes - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-19 06:38:23 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-19 04:44:27 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-19 03:27:19 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 7)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-19 02:39:48 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 8)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-18 22:23:55 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 9)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 20:04:04 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 10)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-18 17:32:40 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-18 04:21:08 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- You pretty much have it - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 05:45:19 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: You pretty much have it - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 11:56:28 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 04:36:07 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- government - Baldur on 2010-December-18 17:44:25 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- You pretty much have it - Lateralus on 2010-December-18 05:45:19 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: A few points for Lat... - Baldur on 2010-December-18 18:30:17 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 11)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-16 03:49:07 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 04:43:59 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 04:11:21 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-16 07:52:54 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-16 04:43:59 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- A few points for Lat... - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 03:56:01 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 18)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - qtns2di4 on 2010-December-16 02:13:31 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 25)
- Re: The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 18:12:08 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 26)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 11:03:47 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 17:44:51 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- There is NO burden of proof upon us - Seamus on 2010-December-15 11:14:19 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: There is NO burden of proof upon us - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 21:57:28 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- You insist on showing your ass - Seamus on 2010-December-17 08:39:39 EST, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: There is NO burden of proof upon us - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 21:57:28 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- There is NO burden of proof upon us - Seamus on 2010-December-15 11:14:19 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 17:44:51 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - gimwinkle on 2010-December-14 09:53:39 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Correction - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 07:22:34 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- The only thing meaningless is your drivel - Seamus on 2010-December-15 10:59:18 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 27)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 07:19:10 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 35)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Baldur on 2010-December-13 18:09:53 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 5)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - gimwinkle on 2010-December-13 18:21:23 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 18:16:37 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 10:55:30 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Yeah, that sounds right--thanks!--NT - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 18:00:31 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Grrrr . . . --NT - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 18:17:28 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 10:55:30 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Scotty on 2010-December-14 06:09:15 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 36)
- Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 17:51:50 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 43)
- 'Their conceit' I meant, not 'there conceit'--NT - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 16:00:42 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: What scholars? - Iron Marxist on 2010-December-18 05:12:39 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- What scholars? - Lateralus on 2010-December-13 15:59:36 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 67)
- The Three Bodied Problem, solved. - Dante on 2010-December-13 07:55:35 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: The Three Bodied Problem, solved. - gimwinkle on 2010-December-13 09:51:55 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)