GirlChat #703197

Start A New Topic!  Date Index  Thread Index

Changing the TOXIC image

Posted by Alice on 2015-June-23 23:45:50 EDT, Tuesday
  Views: 2    Likes: 0     
As mentioned in an earlier thread I feel that paedophilia has become a toxic word. A word now long detached from its historic semantic, and popularly associated with the sexual exploitation of minors. This image is firmly fixed in the public consciousness, will not be erased, and it is simply no longer accurate or helpful to use the term paedophilia. We can debate what has caused this shift over time, blame the media, politicians, and all the rest of it for distorting it’s meaning - but at the end of the day that won't get anyone anywhere. In order to take girllove out from behind the keyboard and towards a living reality.. Out from a dying closed doors debating society and towards the long road of gaining social acceptance in the real world, I feel we need to undergo a process of healthy self-examination, and then think more seriously about how this human treasure can best be brought to the world with a positive health-giving message. I would propose the girllove community think about this.

Parents naturally want to protect their children, we must understand this is not simply a response to paedophilia-scaremongering; the drive to nurture and protect is primal instinct, natural, and legitimate. Everyone must come to see that and respect the dynamics of what we are dealing with. How else will parents arrive at a better understanding and more trusting place, about girllove. They don’t even know what it is. They have never had the chance to see the qualitative distinction between girllove and sexual exploitation of minors.

You know, everyone has, well, grown up, and faced the reality of our climate. They have done so however through resignation rather than leaps of wisdom, self-preserving silence rather than social innovation. Acting like St. Peter before the Crucifixion… I don't know him… Distance, dissociation, and silence. If the understandable fear of being smeared, targeted, or losing respectability, is all that the very best progressives have to offer - then it is time for us (the girllove remnant) to consider a fresh approach.

I feel above all it is critical that we make a clear distinction between girllove and the sexual exploitation of children. Between aesthetics and sensuality, and adult-child sex. We have a choice to make, we can either allow girllove to be poisoned, or fight fearlessly with a new reinvigorated passion for its place in this world. We have to cut off the gangrenous limb, or else the whole beautiful body will die before ever having a chance to fully live. From what I’ve seen of Virtuous Paedophiles, that guilt-ridden den is not the answer. It’s not about facilitating a confessional therapy state of agreeing that somehow there is something intrinsically wrong and unhealthy about it all, and who we are. And it is not simply about a softening or rebranding of image without any substance. No, there is need for a clear redefinition of what girllove is and what it is not, and thinking creatively about this can be presented to the world through the media. It’s something worth celebrating after all.

In my view, girllove should not welcome those with a toxic agenda, and reduce the amount of naval-gazing sexual discussions; which tbh, would understandably seem really far for regular folks in the real world. I think if girllove had a more friendly softer and ethically-considered online community presence, then more women particularly would share, closeted teachers and the like. From what I gather, VP makes the pretence of being ethically considered, but it’s just a snare. girllove should not gradually become the preserve of the therapeutic state. If that’s their agenda? girllove It is not pathological. girllove is a joy to be celebrated and lived. For responsible and independent minds.

girllove is girlpower.

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses