GirlChat #560277

Start A New Topic!  Date Index  Thread Index

Diss would call it debate

Posted by lee lette on 2012-July-27 15:07:35 EDT, Friday
In reply to *sigh*.... This is sad posted by GL_in_lyrics on 2012-July-27 08:59:12 EDT, Friday
  Views: 2    Likes: 0     
I don't see much point in debating either since I do think that either you see the issue one way or the other depending upon your life experiences and how you view children - all children that is not just the few one might have come across in one's life.


But, since it seems one has to defend what one believes ...

In the past when this witch hunt wasn't as bad, it was much easier for pedos to have sex with children.

You were around then? I wouldn't rely on any historical eveidence to support such views. Child prostitution is rife today in many countries but condemned by most civilised people so what does this mean in the context of "pedos having sex with children."

Unfortunately for Lee Lette, he has to choose one extreme or the other.

Lee Lette might see his position as reflecting reality just as much as you do GL_in_lyrics.

Pedophilia is so common, as is a child's sexuality, that people aren't going to give a damn.

So is sexual child abuse and they seem to give a damn about that. What is perhaps regarded as "consensual" and what is regarded as abuse is not clear however.

As everyone knows, the efforts of Antis even today are futile at stopping child/adult sex.

Some of the vigilantes might see it differently as might the numbers involved in protecting children from such abuse. Have you actually seen any progress towards the legitimising of sexual relationships between adults and pre-pubescents over the last few decades?

The "Lee Lettes" of this world are dreaming if they think simply having an Age of Consent is good enough for their cause.

I seldom dream these days (not remembering them at least) and certainly see no affect of having any AOC laws as to preventing young people having sex. They have always done so it seems but there are equally just as many perhaps who regret having had early sex. Where does the truth lie? I never had any such misconceptions but my interest is with pre-pubescents and their protection not with the teenagers who might wish to have sex and essentially have no problems or perhaps do. They are entitled to make their own decisions and mistakes perhaps, essentially being adult in most things whereas pre-pubescents are decidedly not.

As a child I was very sexual, and I've talked to others who were like that when they were children

Perhaps it has never occurred to you that this might have formed your current views on the subject and that these experiences were atypical? The fact that you will be drawn to those with similar experiences and hence to GC is hardly a revelation.

I don't know what's going to be done about sexually repressed children,

Perhaps because the "repression" is in your head and most children are not actually repressed. My first experiences of arousal if I recall happened when I was about aged ten with my first erection. I would not expect that anything prior to this would be called sexual and I doubt I was a late starter. From some of the sources I have quoted previously it seems that it is especially atypical to have what most would regard as true sexual experiences prior to puberty rather than just sex-play and exploration.


This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses